[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4644A01F.4080501@ru.mvista.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 16:55:59 +0000
From: Maxim Uvarov <muvarov@...mvista.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Performance Stats: Kernel patch
Andi Kleen wrote:
>Maxim Uvarov <muvarov@...mvista.com> writes:
>
>
>>This data is useful for detecting hyperactivity
>>patterns between processes.
>>
>>
>
>You need a lot better rationale to slow down these important
>fast paths. Particularly the syscall path is very hot.
>
>Is this something that is really generally useful? The context
>switch counters might be occasionally useful, but strace can
>you just give the syscall count anyways. Still not sure
>it really should go into the standard kernel. Perhaps just keep it
>as a systemtap script?
>
>-Andi
>
>
It is difficult to use strace for multi thread applications to
verify which thread is doing what.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists