linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spelling fixes: arch/mips/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4644CA60.8080809@simon.arlott.org.uk>
Date:	Fri, 11 May 2007 20:56:16 +0100
From:	Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>
To:	Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>
CC:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, trivial@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spelling fixes: arch/mips/

On 11/05/07 20:42, Simon Arlott wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/semaphore.c b/arch/mips/kernel/semaphore.c
> index 1265358..b363604 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/semaphore.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/semaphore.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
>  *    return old_count;
>  *
>  * On machines without lld/scd we need a spinlock to make the 
> manipulation of
> - * sem->count and sem->waking atomic.  Scalability isn't an issue because
> + * sem->count and sem->waking atomic.  Scalibility isn't an issue because
>  * this lock is used on UP only so it's just an empty variable.
>  */
> static inline int __sem_update_count(struct semaphore *sem, int incr)

I thought I'd reverted that mistake... it was correct already, too many 
"capability" fixes confusing me :/

-- 
Simon Arlott
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/