linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] memory hotremove patch take 2 [02/10] (make page unused)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 11 May 2007 09:49:18 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc:	y-goto@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...l.org, mel@....ul.ie
Subject: Re: [RFC] memory hotremove patch take 2 [02/10] (make page unused)

On Thu, 10 May 2007 11:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> wrote:

> On Wed, 9 May 2007, Yasunori Goto wrote:
> 
> > This patch is for supporting making page unused.
> > 
> > Isolate pages by capturing freed pages before inserting free_area[],
> > buddy allocator.
> > If you have an idea for avoiding spin_lock(), please advise me.
> 
> Using the zone lock instead may avoid to introduce another lock? Or is the 
> new lock here for performance reasons?
> 
> Isnt it possible to just add another flavor of pages like what Mel has 
> been doing with reclaimable and movable? I.e. add another category of free 
> pages to Mel's scheme called isolated and use Mel's function to move stuff 
> over there?
> 
Mel-san's idea seems good. So we'll rewrite the whole this patch.

Thank you.
-Kame

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/