linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2] at91: fix enable/disable_irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200705102301.56964.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date:	Thu, 10 May 2007 23:01:56 -0700
From:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Marc Pignat <marc.pignat@...s.ch>, andrew@...people.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] at91: fix enable/disable_irq_wake symmetry in pcmcia driver

On Thursday 10 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

> "disable_irq_wake call must be symmetric with enable_irq_wake".  hmm, OK,
> I'll take your word for it.

In the same way that enable_irq() and disable_irq() must be matched,
and for the same reasons:  when the IRQ is shared between drivers,
they can't all treat enable/disable status as boolean.  Those calls
mask refcountig.

> Does the present code actually fail in some manner, or what?

Yes ... runtime warnings flagging various misbehaviors associated
with refcount mismatches.

- Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/