[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1178868666.23513.49.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:31:06 +1000
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] lguest guest feedback tidyups
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 07:56 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 11:21:30AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > 1) send-dma and bind-dma hypercall wrappers for drivers to use,
> > 2) formalization of the convention that devices can use the irq
> > corresponding to their index on the lguest_bus.
> > 3) ___force to shut up sparse: guests *can* use ioremap as virtual mem.
>
> No, they can't. Even if in your case the underlying address spaces
> happen to be the same anything returned by ioremap must use the proper
> accessors. That's the whole point of having this separation, otherwise
> you wouldn't need to use ioremap at all.
Hi Christoph!
Well, without ioremap, the memory wouldn't normally be mapped. Is
there something better to use?
> So instead of sprinkling cast
> around add lguest_read*/lguest_write* accessors that do the __force cast
> once and make sure the ioremap return value is always accessed using those.
And that's nothing to do with iremap. They're required because guest
"physical" == host virtual, and casting a long to a "__user void *"
seems to require a __force.
I enjoy a good Hellwigging as much as anyone, but your aim is off.
Cheers,
Rusty.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists