linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] UDF: check for allocated memory for inode data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <84144f020705120315i47b033e9w702266ab4d0631bc@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 12 May 2007 13:15:14 +0300
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Cyrill Gorcunov" <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc:	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Ben Fennema" <bfennema@...con.csc.calpoly.edu>,
	"Jan Kara" <jack@....cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UDF: check for allocated memory for inode data

Hi Cyrill

On 5/12/07, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:
> you know I've got a question (may be it's stupid) - what a
> sense to discard UDF_I_* macroses? I mean as I see they
> don't slow down execution of the code...

They make the code harder to read and maintain.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/