[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070512115151.GB10873@zakalwe.fi>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 14:51:51 +0300
From: Heikki Orsila <shdl@...alwe.fi>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Johannes Stezenbach <js@...uxtv.org>,
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
jimmy bahuleyan <knight.camelot@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 3
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 09:53:03AM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> [slightly off topic: GCCisms in Linux kernel]
> > It contains *many* constructs that are not defined in, for
> > example, C99, and it would in fact be impossible to write the Linux
> > kernel using only C99-compliant constructs.
>
> True. On the other hand, it is possible to keep large parts of the
> kernel independent of compiler implementation details. And it is not
> only possible but also beneficial, e.g. because the compiler's
> implementation changes over time.
I think the most important reason for portable code is that new readers
are more familiar with effects of the code.
--
Heikki Orsila Barbie's law:
heikki.orsila@....fi "Math is hard, let's go shopping!"
http://www.iki.fi/shd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists