[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4645DCA2.80408@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 17:26:26 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: Esben Nielsen <nielsen.esben@...glemail.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] convert mmap_sem to a scalable rw_mutex
Esben Nielsen a écrit :
>
>
> On Sat, 12 May 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 11:27 +0200, Esben Nielsen wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 11 May 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I was toying with a scalable rw_mutex and found that it gives ~10%
>>>> reduction in
>>>> system time on ebizzy runs (without the MADV_FREE patch).
>>>>
>>>
>>> You break priority enheritance on user space futexes! :-(
>>> The problems is that the futex waiter have to take the mmap_sem. And as
>>> your rw_mutex isn't PI enabled you get priority inversions :-(
>>
>> Do note that rwsems have no PI either.
>> PI is not a concern for mainline - yet, I do have ideas here though.
>>
>>
> If PI wasn't a concern for mainline, why is PI futexes merged into the
> mainline?
If you really care about futexes and mmap_sem, just use private futexes, since
they dont use mmap_sem at all.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists