[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46455EB4.901@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 23:29:08 -0700
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Pierre Peiffer <pierre.peiffer@...l.net>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI is not quite there
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Well yup. We're kind of waiting for someone to reply
> to http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/7/129
Seems to be the same or at least related.
On comment about my first mail: this is the correct code of condvars,
despite what I wrote before. I wasn't thinking clear. The internal
futex is a normal futex. It is the job of the CMP_REQUEUE_PI call to
figure this out, select the waiter with the highest priority, and boost
the priority if necessary based on the targer futex which always is a PI
futex.
--
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists