| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <46458750.3020605@simon.arlott.org.uk> Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 10:22:24 +0100 From: Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu> To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Request to mailing list Linux-arm-kernel rejected On 12/05/07 08:52, linux-arm-kernel-bounces@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk wrote: > Your request to the Linux-arm-kernel mailing list > > Posting of your message titled "[PATCH] spelling fixes: arch/arm/" > > has been rejected by the list moderator. The moderator gave the > following reason for rejecting your request: > > "Non-members are not allowed to post messages to this list. You need > to subscribe before you're allowed to post. Use the patch system for > patches (see www.arm.linux.org.uk) " It's amazing, you appear to have taken the worst feature of bug/feature management systems - mandatory registration - and applied it to patch submission too. Is that rejection message standard? The first part makes no sense - why would you hold non-subscriber emails in a submission queue and then just reject them because they're not subscribers? > Any questions or comments should be directed to the list administrator > at: > > linux-arm-kernel-owner@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk -- Simon Arlott - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists