linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] lguest host feedback tidyups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070513183934.GY4095@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 13 May 2007 19:39:34 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] lguest host feedback tidyups

On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 11:19:14AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ u32 lgread_u32(struct lguest *lg, u32 ad
>  
>  	/* Don't let them access lguest binary */
>  	if (!lguest_address_ok(lg, addr, sizeof(val))
> -	    || get_user(val, (u32 __user *)addr) != 0)
> +	    || get_user(val, (__force u32 __user *)addr) != 0)
>  		kill_guest(lg, "bad read address %u", addr);
>  	return val;

*Ahem*

What kind of address are we really getting there?  IOW, where does it
ultimately come from?

>  	lock_cpu_hotplug();
>  	if (cpu_has_pge) { /* We have a broader idea of "global". */
>  		cpu_had_pge = 1;
> -		on_each_cpu(adjust_pge, 0, 0, 1);
> +		on_each_cpu(adjust_pge, (void *)0, 0, 1);

That's called NULL...

>  	case LHCALL_LOAD_TLS:
> -		guest_load_tls(lg, (struct desc_struct __user*)regs->edx);
> +		guest_load_tls(lg,
> +			       (__force struct desc_struct __user*)regs->edx);

Umm...  That's borderline OK, but...

>  static void push_guest_stack(struct lguest *lg, u32 __user **gstack, u32 val)
>  {
> -	lgwrite_u32(lg, (u32)--(*gstack), val);
> +	lgwrite_u32(lg, (__force u32)--(*gstack), val);
>  }

Now, _that_ is just plain dumb.  Why not declare that lgwrite_u32() as taking
u32 __user * as argument and kill the casts?

> -	lg->regs->esp = (u32)gstack + lg->page_offset;
> +	lg->regs->esp = (__force u32)gstack + lg->page_offset;

Yuck.  Cast to unsigned long (or uintptr_t), please.  In this case it is
legitimate.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/