linux-kernel - Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1179081922.3723.61.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
Date:	Sun, 13 May 2007 13:45:22 -0500
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>
To:	Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>
Cc:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?

On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 19:26 +0100, Simon Arlott wrote:
> On 13/05/07 18:48, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 18:42 +0100, Simon Arlott wrote:
> >>> If you set CONFIG_MODULE=y and build SCSI we assume you could have a
> >>> SCSI driver module at some point, which would necessitate the wait scan
> >>> module.
> >> This should be implemented like "Library routines" and only added if such 
> >> a SCSI driver module is actually selected. Why can't it at least be a 
> >> visible option in the menu? (Although even then it looks like it's 
> >> impossible to disable).
> > 
> > There's out of tree modules to consider.
> 
> Ok, I propose we make dozens of modules default 'm' in case an out of 
> tree module requires it.
> 
> SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC ("Asynchronous SCSI scanning"): "You can load the 
> scsi_wait_scan module to ensure that all scans have completed."
> 
> It looks like SCSI_WAIT_SCAN is pointless unless SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC 
> is selected - so it should depend on it:

Why don't you just actually read the thread?  Then you'd understand why
this isn't correct.

James


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/