[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200705132314.44688.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 23:14:43 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
Paul E McKenney <paulmck@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFD] Freezing of kernel threads
On Sunday, 13 May 2007 22:49, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Sun, 13 May 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Besides, the problems with interdependencies that we've had recently are
> > related specifically to the CPU hotplug. To be precise, they are related to the
> > CPU hotplug notifiers that try to stop kernel threads which may be frozen.
> > The other interdependencies don't lead to freezer-related problems.
>
> Sure they do. We've always had interdependencies and freezer-related
> problems. That's why PF_NOFREEZE exists in the first place.
Okay, we've already discussed that. I was referring to the recent problems
and I should have added "at present" to the last sentence. :-)
> Claiming this is somehow CPU hotplug-related is disingenious, since the
> freezer hasn't even been used for that historically, yet clearly we *do*
> have the NOFREEZE stuff.
>
> Those kernel threads tend to exists for a reason.
Agreed.
Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists