[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070513153555.7f7dc350.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 15:35:55 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] clockevents: Fix resume logic - updated version
On Sun, 13 May 2007 22:07:39 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, I expect quite a few people will start seeing that. iirc it was
> > triggered by a couple of changes: a local_irq_save/local_irq_restore
> > in sched_clock() and a change Jeremy made to the softlockup detector.
>
> hm, i specifically asked to not do local_irq_save/restore in
> sched_clock(). It's the _scheduler_ clock and it very absolutely
> positively needs no flags save/restore.
>
It got taken out again.
It doesn't matter though: a local_irq_save/restore in some callee shouldn't
cause the locking API tests to break. And they're apparently now breaking
without that local_irq_save/restore in there anyway.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists