[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1179037601.2802.96.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 14:26:40 +0800
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
"YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@" <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-2.6.21-gitN - versioning question
On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 17:01 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On May 12 2007 21:44, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 17:19 +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> >> Actually I think it would be convenient if such tags (like
> >> v.2.6.21-git16) were in Linus' git tree too.
> >
> >Then there would be _lots_ of tags in the master tree -- I'm not sure we
> >want that.
> >
> >I suppose I could put a tree on kernel.org which _does_ have the tags,
> >and which precisely matches Linus' tree in every other way... but then
> >again, you could do that too by just rsyncing the tags yourself :)
>
> Are you saying GIT tags are expensive, compared to, say, SVN tags?
I wasn't saying that -- I've no idea how expensive SVN tags are. But I
was of the opinion that GIT tags aren't free -- I thought I'd seen
git-pull explicitly checking (with one round-trip latency) that it has
the corresponding commit for every tag it knows about.
--
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists