[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1abw9qkve.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 00:48:53 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: "Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Vivek Goyal" <vgoyal@...ibm.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]x86_64: build and use GDT on copied compressed kernel
"Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> writes:
> On 5/12/07, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>> Overwriting the GDT should be fine because we don't reload the segments,
>> after we overwrite it. GDT entries are only read when we load segments.
>> Interrupts are disabled so that should not cause a problem.
>>
>> Why do you think the current behaviour is a problem?
>
> just think if GDT should not be overwriten when we are still under
> that GDT setting.
> didn't have chance to test that in HDT or other debug device, when
> setting breaking point after that GDT is overwriten.
It would be interesting to see if you could produce a failure using
that gdt, I don't think you will be able to, even with a debugger.
For data segments we never use that GDT, it is only for the code
segment we use the GDT and that only to get us into 64bit mode.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists