[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070514124210.71d94d58@the-village.bc.nu>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 12:42:10 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Bob Johnston <haloman@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: undeprecate raw driver.
On Sun, 13 May 2007 23:01:51 +0000 (UTC)
Bob Johnston <haloman@...il.com> wrote:
> Stefan Richter <stefanr <at> s5r6.in-berlin.de> writes:
> > So why don't we simply say:
> >
> > - "Users of feature A are urged to migrate to alternative B."
> > - "Feature C will be removed in February 2038."
> >
> > Everybody understands the meaning of /that/.
>
> Why not just use the terms:
> * outdated - as a replacement for "deprecated".
Because they don't actually mean the same thing ?
> * toberemoved - as a replacement for "obsolete".
With spaces, I'd hope.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists