linux-kernel - Re: undeprecate raw driver.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 May 2007 12:42:10 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Bob Johnston <haloman@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: undeprecate raw driver.

On Sun, 13 May 2007 23:01:51 +0000 (UTC)
Bob Johnston <haloman@...il.com> wrote:

> Stefan Richter <stefanr <at> s5r6.in-berlin.de> writes:
> > So why don't we simply say:
> > 
> >   - "Users of feature A are urged to migrate to alternative B."
> >   - "Feature C will be removed in February 2038."
> > 
> > Everybody understands the meaning of /that/.
> 
> Why not just use the terms:
> * outdated - as a replacement for "deprecated".

Because they don't actually mean the same thing ?

> * toberemoved - as a replacement for "obsolete".

With spaces, I'd hope.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/