[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705140927470.10801@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 09:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Phillips <phillips@...gle.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Matt Mackall wrote:
> privileged thread unprivileged greedy process
> kmem_cache_alloc(...)
> adds new slab page from lowmem pool
Yes but it returns an object for the privileged thread. Is that not
enough?
> do_io()
> kmem_cache_alloc(...)
> kmem_cache_alloc(...)
> kmem_cache_alloc(...)
> kmem_cache_alloc(...)
> kmem_cache_alloc(...)
> ...
> eats it all
> kmem_cache_alloc(...) -> ENOMEM
> who ate my donuts?!
>
> But I think this solution is somehow overkill. If we only care about
> this issue in the OOM avoidance case, then our rank reduces to a
> boolean.
>
> --
> Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists