| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4648B29A.6080406@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 23:03:54 +0400 From: Manu Abraham <abraham.manu@...il.com> To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: pci probe Hi, I do have a device that's a multifunction device. Eventhough a MFD, it just has one Interrupt which is shared by by a Configuration space for each function. ie, INTA is shared between them functions. In such a case, i am wondering, (since pci_probe returns a pointer to one PCI function alone and i need to use both the functions in one module alone rather than using a module for each function and that the functions are quite similar for them to be used in different modules, such that a separate probe/ISR etc is used) whether using pci_get_device would be a better alternative to do manual searching for the functions in such a case. Thanks, Manu - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists