[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070514124451.c868c4c0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 12:44:51 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Daniel Phillips <phillips@...gle.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair
On Mon, 14 May 2007 11:12:24 -0500
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com> wrote:
> If I understand this correctly:
>
> privileged thread unprivileged greedy process
> kmem_cache_alloc(...)
> adds new slab page from lowmem pool
> do_io()
> kmem_cache_alloc(...)
> kmem_cache_alloc(...)
> kmem_cache_alloc(...)
> kmem_cache_alloc(...)
> kmem_cache_alloc(...)
> ...
> eats it all
> kmem_cache_alloc(...) -> ENOMEM
> who ate my donuts?!
Yes, that's my understanding also.
I can see why it's a problem in theory, but I don't think Peter has yet
revealed to us why it's a problem in practice. I got all excited when
Christoph asked "I am not sure what the point of all of this is.", but
Peter cunningly avoided answering that ;)
What observed problem is being fixed here?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists