[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4de7f8a60705141335m7214e8e9k9f96244738dd2b4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 22:35:47 +0200
From: "Jan Blunck" <jblunck@...e.de>
To: "Bharata B Rao" <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
"Jan Blunck" <j.blunck@...harburg.de>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 13/14] ext3 whiteout support
On 5/14/07, Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com> wrote:
> On May 14, 2007 15:14 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> > #define EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_JOURNAL_DEV 0x0008 /* Journal device */
> > #define EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_META_BG 0x0010
> > +#define EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_WHITEOUT 0x0020
>
> Is this flag reserved with Ted? It isn't listed in the e2fsprogs repo.
>
I don't know. I tried to contact him a few weeks ago but failed.
Guess, maybe he isn't reading the @thunk.org email anymore which was
reference in the e2fsprogs source I used.
Ted,
from ext2_fs.h I learn that the value 0x0020 is left unused.
#define EXT2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_META_BG 0x0010
#define EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EXTENTS 0x0040
#define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_64BIT 0x0080
Is this intentionally?
Cheers,
Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists