linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] kbuild: Add "Section mismatch" warning whitelist for powerpc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 May 2007 23:13:20 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Li Yang <leoli@...escale.com>,
	Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kbuild: Add "Section mismatch" warning whitelist for powerpc

On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 12:30:46PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Li Yang <leoli@...escale.com>
> > > Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
> 
> I always get confused when a git-tree-owner says "acked-by" against a patch
> which falls within his tree's area.  An acked-by would mean "I'm OK with
> the patch, please apply it".  But I'd have expected to see a "thanks,
> applied" instead.

I have saved the patch so I can apply it if Linus does not do so.
My "Acked-by:" was actually mostly to tell Linus that I was OK
with the modpost changes although I did not write so in my mail.

So if this is not picked up by Linus I will pick up this patch.

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/