[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4648F04B.9050204@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 19:27:07 -0400
From: Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>
To: Kevin Lloyd <klloyd@...rrawireless.com>
CC: gregkh@...e.de, mdharm-usb@...-eyed-alien.net,
linux-usb-users@...ts.sourceforge.net,
usb-storage@...ts.one-eyed-alien.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb-storage: Add support for unusual device by Sierra
Wireless
Kevin Lloyd wrote:
> Not a bad idea. When using the US_FL_IGNORE_DEVICE flag, that causes the
> usb-storage driver to no load the device and allow another driver
> properly load it? The reason I ask is because I previously had a
> separate driver for the device, however there were priority issues
> regarding which loaded first usb-storage or the separate driver.
Yes, that's what it's designed for. If usb-storage does come first, the
US_FL_IGNORE_DEVICE flag causes it to return -ENODEV from probe, which
causes the driver core to look for other candidate drivers to claim the
device.
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists