[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1179223081.6810.133.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 11:58:01 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, ck@....kolivas.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: swap prefetch more improvements
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 15:00 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2007 10:50:54 +1000
> Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org> wrote:
>
> > akpm, please queue on top of "mm: swap prefetch improvements"
> >
> > ---
> > Failed radix_tree_insert wasn't being handled leaving stale kmem.
> >
> > The list should be iterated over in the reverse order when prefetching.
> >
> > Make the yield within kprefetchd stronger through the use of cond_resched.
>
> hm.
>
> >
> > - might_sleep();
> > - if (!prefetch_suitable())
> > + /* Yield to anything else running */
> > + if (cond_resched() || !prefetch_suitable())
> > goto out_unlocked;
>
> So if cond_resched() happened to schedule away, we terminate this
> swap-tricking attempt. It's not possible to determine the reasons for this
> from the code or from the changelog (==bad).
>
> How come?
I think Con meant need_resched(). That would indicate someone else wants
to use the CPU and and has higher priority than kprefetchd.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists