linux-kernel - Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 May 2007 11:29:06 -0600
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To:	Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>
Cc:	James Bottomley <james.bottomley@...eleye.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, kernel-packagers@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning

On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 05:30:50PM +0100, Simon Arlott wrote:
> On 15/05/07 13:02, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >It's easy to suggest a sysfs attribute.  What you've failed to do is
> >suggest the pathname of the sysfs attribute, the contents of it, or the
> >semantics of it (read-only?  read-write?  write-only?  blocking?)
> 
> I would assume that should be up to SCSI users/maintainer(s). The only 
> thing I use the SCSI driver for is usb-storage/ATAPI.

Then you're not so much "suggesting a sysfs attribute" as whining.

> >I'd *really* like to hear from distro people.  What is the most
> >convenient way for you to implement "load all the scsi modules, then
> >wait until all devices are found"?  James and I had thought that loading
> >a new module would be the easiest way for you, but it seems inconvenient
> >for you.
> 
> It's inconvenient for people who *don't* use it to be unable to stop the 
> module being built and installed.

Why?  You're not forced to load the module.  In what way does it
inconvenience you?  Nobody's making you run 'make modules_install'.
I often forget to myself.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/