[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070515172905.GJ10562@parisc-linux.org>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 11:29:06 -0600
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To: Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>
Cc: James Bottomley <james.bottomley@...eleye.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, kernel-packagers@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 05:30:50PM +0100, Simon Arlott wrote:
> On 15/05/07 13:02, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >It's easy to suggest a sysfs attribute. What you've failed to do is
> >suggest the pathname of the sysfs attribute, the contents of it, or the
> >semantics of it (read-only? read-write? write-only? blocking?)
>
> I would assume that should be up to SCSI users/maintainer(s). The only
> thing I use the SCSI driver for is usb-storage/ATAPI.
Then you're not so much "suggesting a sysfs attribute" as whining.
> >I'd *really* like to hear from distro people. What is the most
> >convenient way for you to implement "load all the scsi modules, then
> >wait until all devices are found"? James and I had thought that loading
> >a new module would be the easiest way for you, but it seems inconvenient
> >for you.
>
> It's inconvenient for people who *don't* use it to be unable to stop the
> module being built and installed.
Why? You're not forced to load the module. In what way does it
inconvenience you? Nobody's making you run 'make modules_install'.
I often forget to myself.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists