[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705151457060.3155@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 15:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Phillips <phillips@...gle.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> How about something like this; it seems to sustain a little stress.
Argh again mods to kmem_cache.
Could we do this with a new slab page flag? F.e. SlabEmergPool.
in alloc_slab() do
if (is_emergency_pool_page(page)) {
SetSlabDebug(page);
SetSlabEmerg(page);
}
So now you can intercept allocs to the SlabEmerg slab in __slab_alloc
debug:
if (SlabEmergPool(page)) {
if (mem_no_longer_critical()) {
/* Avoid future trapping */
ClearSlabDebug(page);
ClearSlabEmergPool(page);
} else
if (process_not_allowed_this_memory()) {
do_something_bad_to_the_caller();
} else {
/* Allocation permitted */
}
}
....
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists