[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200705160023.55899.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 00:23:55 +0100
From: Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@....ed.ac.uk>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64 highres/dyntick support 2.6.22-rc1-v4
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 09:18:02 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> I've uploaded a new version of the x86_64 highres/dyntick patches:
>
> http://www.tglx.de/projects/hrtimers/2.6.22-rc1/linux-2.6.22-rc1-x86_64-hig
>hres-v4.patch
>
> Broken out version:
>
> http://www.tglx.de/projects/hrtimers/2.6.22-rc1/linux-2.6.22-rc1-x86_64-hig
>hres-v4.patches.tar.bz2
>
> Changes since last version:
>
> - TSC calibration against PM-Timer
Working fine now, thanks a lot. Great latencies on usleep() now too, just what
I was looking for.
(BTW, with HRT (but not NO_HZ), does the HZ value have any effect on usleep()
(and friends) latencies?)
--
Cheers,
Alistair.
Final year Computer Science undergraduate.
1F2 55 South Clerk Street, Edinburgh, UK.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists