linux-kernel - Re: filesystem benchmarking fun

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 16 May 2007 12:01:06 -0400
From:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
To:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: filesystem benchmarking fun

Chris Mason wrote:
> For example, I'll pick on xfs for a minute.  compilebench shows the
> default FS you get from mkfs.xfs is pretty slow for untarring a bunch of
> kernel trees.  Dave Chinner gave me some mount options that make it
> dramatically better, but it still writes at 10MB/s on a sata drive that
> can do 80MB/s.  Ext3 is better, but still only 20MB/s. 
> 

Now try JFS. My lawn grows faster than it can write a new kernel tree.

What we need is a tool that shows *why* this stuff happens...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/