[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070516162459.GD30166@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 12:24:59 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Joshua Hoblitt <jhoblitt@....hawaii.edu>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
<dropping trivial@ from cc: as this definitly isn't>
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 03:17:11PM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> --- linux-2.6.21.1.orig/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig 2007-04-27 11:49:26.000000000 -1000
> +++ linux-2.6.21.1/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig 2007-05-15 14:48:50.000000000 -1000
> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ config X86_POWERNOW_K8
> tristate "AMD Opteron/Athlon64 PowerNow!"
> select CPU_FREQ_TABLE
> depends on EXPERIMENTAL
> + depends on X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ
> help
> This adds the CPUFreq driver for mobile AMD Opteron/Athlon64 processors.
This is completely the wrong thing to do.
There's no dependancy between these two modules, as they are two independant
cpufreq drivers. I think you may be confused with X86_POWERNOW_K8_ACPI
(Which should get set if you have ACPI_PROCESSOR enabled)
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists