[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <24100.1179337608@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:46:48 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc: akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] AFS: Implement shared-writable mmap [try #2]
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> wrote:
> > How do you do a write-through cache for shared-writable mmap?
>
> For shared writable mmap? I don't know...
You can't do write-through caching for shared-writable mmap because the writes
go directly into the pagecache once the page is made writable, at least, short
of instruction emulation.
At some point in the future we'll be asked to turf the data back to the
server.
> does POSIX require mmap data to be coherent with read(2)/write(2)? ;)
I suspect so, but I don't know offhand. I want it to be coherent anyway,
otherwise it's inconsistent with OpenAFS and Arla (or at least more so).
Note also that the choice of write-through or write-back caching also has
implications for local on-disk caching of modified data and disconnected
operation.
> I just mean more generally. simple write(2) writes, for starters.
Given that writing through an mmap'd section is write-back by its very
nature[*] and so since I have to do write-back anyway, why consider doing
write-through too?
[*] Unless we want to do instruction emulation or single stepping.
Hmmm... I wonder if O_SYNC should use write-through caching.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists