linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e9e943910705161253i75750876s1789b7844c87e97@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 May 2007 20:53:13 +0100
From:	"Duane Griffin" <duaneg@...da.com>
To:	"Prakash Punnoor" <prakash@...noor.de>
Cc:	"Joshua Hoblitt" <jhoblitt@....hawaii.edu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Dave Jones" <davej@...hat.com>, "Daniel Drake" <dsd@...too.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver

On 16/05/07, Prakash Punnoor <prakash@...noor.de> wrote:
> Maybe you want to give a hint in the p states driver help text?

I think a hint is the right thing to do, but in the PowerNow! driver
rather than the p states one. How about adding something like this to
the X86_POWERNOW_K8 (and X86_POWERNOW_K7?) help text:

"ACPI support is required for non-UP systems and requires ACPI_PROCESSOR
 to be selected. If ACPI_PROCESSOR is compiled as a module then this
 option must be too in order for ACPI support to be available."

Cheers,
Duane.

-- 
"I never could learn to drink that blood and call it wine" - Bob Dylan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/