[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070516204807.GA23751@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:48:07 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Duane Griffin <duaneg@...da.com>
Cc: Prakash Punnoor <prakash@...noor.de>,
Joshua Hoblitt <jhoblitt@....hawaii.edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 08:53:13PM +0100, Duane Griffin wrote:
> On 16/05/07, Prakash Punnoor <prakash@...noor.de> wrote:
> > Maybe you want to give a hint in the p states driver help text?
>
> I think a hint is the right thing to do, but in the PowerNow! driver
> rather than the p states one. How about adding something like this to
> the X86_POWERNOW_K8 (and X86_POWERNOW_K7?) help text:
The mobile K7s which had powernow support weren't SMP capable, so they're
irrelevant.
> "ACPI support is required for non-UP systems and requires ACPI_PROCESSOR
> to be selected. If ACPI_PROCESSOR is compiled as a module then this
> option must be too in order for ACPI support to be available."
X86_POWERNOW_K8_ACPI is already 'default y'. I think the problem lies in
that people aren't enabling its dependancy, ACPI_PROCESSOR.
We want something along the lines of..
config X86_POWERNOW_K8_ACPI
bool
if SMP & X86_POWERNOW_K8_ACPI
select ACPI_PROCESSOR
kconfig language quirks aside..
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists