linux-kernel - Re: filesystem benchmarking fun

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200705170001.21099.a1426z@gawab.com>
Date:	Thu, 17 May 2007 00:01:21 +0300
From:	Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: filesystem benchmarking fun

Andrew Morton wrote:
> Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com> wrote:
> > > Should be: it uses first-fit.
> > >
> > > >  Looks like ext3 is just walking a list of
> > > > bh/jh, maybe we can just sort the silly thing?
> > >
> > > The IO scheduler is supposed to do that.
> > >
> > > But I don't know what's causing this.
> >
> > I had high hopes of blaming cfq, but deadline gives the same results:
> >
> > create dir kernel-0 222MB in 5.38 seconds (41.33 MB/s)
> > ... [ ~30MB/s here ] ...
> > create dir kernel-7 222MB in 8.11 seconds (27.42 MB/s)
> > create dir kernel-8 222MB in 18.39 seconds (12.09 MB/s)
> > create dir kernel-9 222MB in 6.91 seconds (32.18 MB/s)
> > create dir kernel-10 222MB in 24.32 seconds (9.14 MB/s)
> > create dir kernel-11 222MB in 12.06 seconds (18.44 MB/s)
> > create dir kernel-12 222MB in 10.95 seconds (20.31 MB/s)
> >
> > The good news is that if you let it run long enough, the times
> > stabilize.  The bad news is:
> >
> > create dir kernel-86 222MB in 15.85 seconds (14.03 MB/s)
> > create dir kernel-87 222MB in 28.67 seconds (7.76 MB/s)
> > create dir kernel-88 222MB in 18.12 seconds (12.27 MB/s)
> > create dir kernel-89 222MB in 19.77 seconds (11.25 MB/s)
>
> well hang on.  Doesn't this just mean that the first few runs were writing
> into pagecache and the later ones were blocking due to dirty-memory
> limits?
>
> Or do you have a sync in there?
>
> > echo 2048 > /sys/block/..../nr_requests didn't do it either.
> >
> > I guess I'll have systemtap tell me more about the log flushing.

Try these:
# echo anticipatory > /sys/block/.../scheduler
# echo 0 > /sys/block/.../iosched/antic_expire
# echo 192 > /sys/block/.../max_sectors_kb
# echo 192 > /sys/block/.../read_ahead_kb

These give me best performance, but most noticeably antic_expire > 0 leaves 
the IOScheduler in a apparent limbo.

see http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5900


Thanks!

--
Al

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/