[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <464B96DD.2000706@bigpond.net.au>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 09:42:21 +1000
From: Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, caglar@...dus.org.tr,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>, Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v12
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au> wrote:
>
>>> As usual, any sort of feedback, bugreport, fix and suggestion is more
>>> than welcome,
>> Load balancing appears to be badly broken in this version. When I
>> started 4 hard spinners on my 2 CPU machine one ended up on one CPU
>> and the other 3 on the other CPU and they stayed there.
>
> hm, i cannot reproduce this on 4 different SMP boxen, trying various
> combinations of SCHED_SMT/MC
You may need to try more than once. Testing load balancing can be a
pain as there's always a possibility you'll get a good result just by
chance. I.e. you need a bunch of good results to say it's OK but only
one bad result to say it's broken. This makes testing load balancing a
pain.
> and other .config options that might make a
> difference to balancing. Could you send me your .config?
Sent separately.
Peter
--
Peter Williams pwil3058@...pond.net.au
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists