[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1179291255.2859.195.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 12:54:14 +0800
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Jörn Engel <joern@...ybastard.org>
Cc: John Stoffel <john@...ffel.org>, akpm@...l.org,
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
Albert Cahalan <acahalan@...il.com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@...eria.de>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 21:19 +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Tue, 15 May 2007 15:07:05 -0400, John Stoffel wrote:
> >
> > I've been semi watching this, and the only comment I really can give
> > is that I hate the name. To me, logfs implies a filesystem for
> > logging purposes, not for Flash hardware with wear leveling issues to
> > be taken into account.
>
> Yeah, well, ...
>
> Two years ago when I started all this, I was looking for a good name.
> All I could come up with sounded stupid, so I picked "LogFS" as a code
> name. As soon as I find a better name, the code name should get
> replaced.
>
> By now I still don't have anything better. All alternatives that were
> proposed are just as bad - with the added disadvantage of being new and
> not established yet. My hope of ever finding a better name is nearly
> zero.
Personally I'd just go for 'JFFS3'. After all, it has a better claim to
the name than either of its predecessors :)
--
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists