lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 16 May 2007 07:21:59 +0200
From:	Jarek Poplawski <>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <>,
	Andrew Morton <>,
	David Chinner <>,
	David Howells <>,
	Gautham Shenoy <>, Ingo Molnar <>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH] make cancel_rearming_delayed_work() reliable

On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 02:08:12AM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 05/15, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > 
> > I've overheared somebody is talking about my favorite 2-nd bit!
> We already discussed this... Surely, we can do this. I believe
> this will complicate (and _imho_ uglify) the code too much.

Yes, but now I see you are about to change your mind about
this bit...

> May be I am wrong. Please provide a detailed description?

I'll try too look more at your solution - maybe it's "not
so bad". I've probably exaggerated yesterday about this
overhead of setting the VALID bit.

Jarek P.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists