linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powernow-k8: depend on acpi-processor for SMP systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <464BA9FB.9020102@comcast.net>
Date:	Wed, 16 May 2007 21:03:55 -0400
From:	Ed Sweetman <safemode2@...cast.net>
To:	Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>
CC:	Joshua Hoblitt <jhoblitt@....hawaii.edu>, davej@...hat.com,
	duaneg@...da.com, prakash@...noor.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powernow-k8: depend on acpi-processor for SMP systems

Daniel Drake wrote:
> Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
>> I don't think this is quiet right either as Ed Sweetman has reported
>> that this issue doesn't occur on single socket/multi-core systems.
>
> Where did he write that? In an off-list mail, Ed seemed to agree with 
> my patch.
>
> Daniel
>
>
What i didn't agree with was the dependency on the acpi P-state driver 
for single socket multi-core systems, where in the original post of this 
thread, Joshua was stating that smp systems required that driver.   
Later it was found that the acpi p-state driver was only being used to 
enforce the dependency on the acpi_processor driver ...which is the 
actual driver we care about (dependency wise).  

So yes, I do agree with your patch, in so far as my experience with the 
hardware.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/