[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1179414370.3642.65.camel@sauron>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 18:06:10 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...radead.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
akpm@...l.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/44 take 2] [UBI] startup code
Christoph,
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 15:44 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> So both I and Rusty told you not to do this and you did it anyway.
>
> I'm quite pissed about this ignorance. Andrew, what do we do about such
> a case? Should we just revert ubi until they fixed their mess up?
Just for reference: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/19/67
Sorry, I thought Rusty meant that we can use it if we invent our own
type, see the first part of his answer. You did not answer Frank's mail
about _why_ we use it. So I thought you agreed with us, I did not ignore
you, no need to be so assertive.
It is not a problem to fix this, but neither Rusty nor you explained
what is wrong with that call. But we _did_ explain why we use it. You
ignored the explanation and the questions.
--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists