[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <464BB252.8010008@cv-sv.de>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 03:39:30 +0200
From: Christian <haveaniceday@...sv.de>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
CC: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ak@...e.de
Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc1 does not boot on VIA C3_2 cause of X86_CMPXCHG64
Dave Jones wrote:
> The C3s all have cx8, but it needs to be enabled in an MSR first.
> (See arch/i386/kernel/cpu/centaur.c , search for CX8)
>
> Did we add code that uses cmpxchg8b before identify_cpu() gets run ?
> I've not been paying attention to .22rc (busy trying to beat .21 into shape for F7)
> so I may have missed something obvious. Andi?
>
> Dave
>
May I brought up a wrong reason with the command cmpxchg64.
But disabling CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG64 helps.
The via C3 EBGA datasheet R1.9 tells me this command works always:
>The CMPXCHG8B instruction is provided and always enabled, however, it appears disabled in the corresponding
>CPUID function bit 0 to avoid a bug in an early version of Windows NT. However, this default can be changed
>via a bit in the FCR MSR.
Hmm, I should be able to add a few small "here I am" to
the my local boot code with a little hint.
Anyway I will try tomorrow to find this on my own.
printfs for debugging are more friendly than assembler.
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Andi added code to verify that we can actually execute on the processor
> before protected mode (so we can still get a message out through the
> BIOS.) That code presumably doesn't know of the MSR that needs to be
> touched.
Best regards,
Christian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists