[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070517174532.GA26827@2ka.mipt.ru>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 21:45:33 +0400
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: Jörn Engel <joern@...ybastard.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, Albert Cahalan <acahalan@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@...eria.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 07:26:07PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt (jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de) wrote:
> >My plan was to move this code to lib/ sooner or later. If you consider
> >it useful in its current state, I can do it immediatly. And if someone
> >else merged a superior btree library I'd happily remove mine and use the
> >new one instead.
> >
> >Opinions?
>
> Why would we need another btree, when there is lib/rbtree.c?
> Or does yours do something fundamentally different?
It is not red-black tree, it is b+ tree.
> Jan
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists