| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20070517182340.GA25691@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 14:23:40 -0400 From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> Cc: Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>, duaneg@...da.com, prakash@...noor.de, jhoblitt@....hawaii.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] powernow-k8: depend on acpi-processor for SMP systems On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 02:13:42PM -0400, Len Brown wrote: > > Index: linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig > > =================================================================== > > --- linux.orig/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig > > +++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig > > @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ config X86_POWERNOW_K7_ACPI > > config X86_POWERNOW_K8 > > tristate "AMD Opteron/Athlon64 PowerNow!" > > select CPU_FREQ_TABLE > > + select ACPI_PROCESSOR if SMP > > depends on EXPERIMENTAL > > help > > This adds the CPUFreq driver for mobile AMD Opteron/Athlon64 processors. > > Unfortunately this patch will not actually enable ACPI_PROCESSOR in > the SMP=y ACPI=n case. "select" doesn't work for targets that > have dependencies. I don't think we can fix this perfectly tbh, but the above at least gets us close for the majority of users. Are there many x86-64 users that don't enable acpi ? Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists