[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070517.132937.29572252.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 13:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: mikulas@...ax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending with tickless plip
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 12:52:11 +0200
> On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 15:00 +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On one of my machines with tickless kernel and plip I get messages :
>
> I bet this is a machine a P4 with Hyperthreading enabled ?
>
> > NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
> >
> > always when using plip (on other machine with tickless kernel and plip I
> > get no errors). Thebug happens both on 2.6.21 and 2.6.22-rc1
> >
> > This patch fixes that. Note that plip calls netif_rx neither from hardware
> > interrupt nor from ksoftirqd, so there is no one who would wake
> > ksoftirqd then. netif_tx calls only
> > __raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_RX_SOFTIRQ), which sets softirq bit, but
> > doesn't wake ksoftirqd.
>
> Dave,
>
> can we please get rid of __raise_softirq_irqoff() at all ? These micro
> optimizations are causing more trouble than they are worth.
Actually I think this is pointing out a bug, in that plip is not
invoking things in the proper context, which will likely cause
other problems :-)
I'll put this on my TODO list and look into this.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists