linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers/ata: Add the SW NCQ support to sata

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 May 2007 23:02:17 +0200
From:	Zoltan Boszormenyi <zboszor@...aweb.hu>
To:	Peer Chen <pchen@...dia.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/ata: Add the SW NCQ support to sata_nv for MCP51/MCP55/MCP61

Hi,

thanks for publishing this.

> Add the Software NCQ support to sata_nv.c for MCP51/MCP55/MCP61 SATA
> controller.
>
> This patch base on sata_nv.c file from kernel 2.6.22-rc1
>
> See attachment for the patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuan Luo <kluo@...dia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peer Chen <pchen@...dia.com>
> ==================================
> See attached file.
> ==================================
>   

However, I saw this in the patch:

+               /* determine if physical DMA addr spans 64K boundary.
+                * Note h/w doesn't support 64-bit, so we unconditionally
+                * truncate dma_addr_t to u32.
+                */
+               addr = (u32) sg_dma_address(sg);

Does it mean that I can't upgrade my machine to 4 GB or more
without losing NCQ or risking data corruption?
Can the code be made IOMMU-aware?

Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/