[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200705172336.14552.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 23:36:13 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: "Jörn Engel" <joern@...ybastard.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, akpm@...l.org,
Albert Cahalan <acahalan@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@...eria.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three
On Thursday 17 May 2007, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>
> Jörn Engel wrote:
> > Compressing random data will actually enlarge it. If that happens I
> > simply store the verbatim uncompressed data instead and mark it as such.
> >
> > There is also demand for a user-controlled bit in the inode to disable
> > compression completely. All those .jpg, .mpg, .mp3, etc. just waste
> > time by trying and failing to compress them.
>
> So any sane way to enable compression is on per-inode basis which makes
> me still wonder why you need per-object compression.
1. it doesn't require user interaction, the file system will do the right
thing most of the time.
2. enlarging data is a very bad thing because it makes the behaviour
of the fs unpredictable. With uncompressed objects, you have a guaranteed
upper bound on the size.
Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists