[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705162145060.31624@asgard.lang.hm>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 21:45:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: david@...g.hm
To: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
cc: Jeff Zheng <Jeff.Zheng@...ace.com>,
Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RE: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is
5TB
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Thursday May 17, Jeff.Zheng@...ace.com wrote:
>>
>>> The only difference of any significance between the working
>>> and non-working configurations is that in the non-working,
>>> the component devices are larger than 2Gig, and hence have
>>> sector offsets greater than 32 bits.
>>
>> Do u mean 2T here?, but in both configuartion, the component devices are
>> larger than 2T (2.25T&5.5T).
>
> Yes, I meant 2T, and yes, the components are always over 2T.
2T decimal or 2T binary?
> So I'm
> at a complete loss. The raid0 code follows the same paths and does
> the same things and uses 64bit arithmetic where needed.
>
> So I have no idea how there could be a difference between these two
> cases.
>
> I'm at a loss...
>
> NeilBrown
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists