[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070516.225129.74748893.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 22:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ssatyam@....iitk.ac.in
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, marcel@...tmann.org, jikos@...os.cz,
gregkh@...e.de, jeremy@...p.org, maxk@...lcomm.com, clg@...ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bluetooth: fix locking in hci_sock_dev_event()
From: Satyam Sharma <ssatyam@....iitk.ac.in>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 11:13:36 +0530 (IST)
> [PATCH] bluetooth: fix locking in hci_sock_dev_event()
>
> We presently use lock_sock() to acquire a lock on a socket in
> hci_sock_dev_event(), but this goes BUG because lock_sock()
> can sleep and we're already holding a read-write spinlock at
> that point. So, we must use the non-sleeping BH version,
> bh_lock_sock().
>
> However, hci_sock_dev_event() is called from user context and
> hence using simply bh_lock_sock() will deadlock against a
> concurrent softirq that tries to acquire a lock on the same
> socket. Hence, disabling BH's before acquiring the socket lock
> and enable them afterwards, is the proper solution to fix
> socket locking in hci_sock_dev_event().
>
> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Signed-off-by: Satyam Sharma <ssatyam@....iitk.ac.in>
> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Thanks I'll merge this in.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists