linux-kernel - [PATCH 6/15] Make input layer use seq_list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <464D73F6.9090708@sw.ru>
Date:	Fri, 18 May 2007 13:37:58 +0400
From:	Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...ru>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
CC:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/15] Make input layer use seq_list_xxx helpers

This is essentially just a renaming of the existing
functions as the seq_list_start() and seq_list_next()
copies already exist in the input.c file. Now we have
them in the generic place.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>

---

diff --git a/drivers/input/input.c b/drivers/input/input.c
index ccd8aba..da83c17 100644
--- a/drivers/input/input.c
+++ b/drivers/input/input.c
@@ -471,37 +471,16 @@ static unsigned int input_proc_devices_p
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static struct list_head *list_get_nth_element(struct list_head *list, loff_t *pos)
-{
-	struct list_head *node;
-	loff_t i = 0;
-
-	list_for_each(node, list)
-		if (i++ == *pos)
-			return node;
-
-	return NULL;
-}
-
-static struct list_head *list_get_next_element(struct list_head *list, struct list_head *element, loff_t *pos)
-{
-	if (element->next == list)
-		return NULL;
-
-	++(*pos);
-	return element->next;
-}
-
 static void *input_devices_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
 {
 	/* acquire lock here ... Yes, we do need locking, I knowi, I know... */
 
-	return list_get_nth_element(&input_dev_list, pos);
+	return seq_list_start(&input_dev_list, *pos);
 }
 
 static void *input_devices_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
 {
-	return list_get_next_element(&input_dev_list, v, pos);
+	return seq_list_next(v, &input_dev_list, pos);
 }
 
 static void input_devices_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
@@ -592,13 +571,13 @@ static void *input_handlers_seq_start(st
 {
 	/* acquire lock here ... Yes, we do need locking, I knowi, I know... */
 	seq->private = (void *)(unsigned long)*pos;
-	return list_get_nth_element(&input_handler_list, pos);
+	return seq_list_start(&input_handler_list, *pos);
 }
 
 static void *input_handlers_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
 {
 	seq->private = (void *)(unsigned long)(*pos + 1);
-	return list_get_next_element(&input_handler_list, v, pos);
+	return seq_list_next(v, &input_handler_list, pos);
 }
 
 static void input_handlers_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/