linux-kernel - Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070518111911.GP10562@parisc-linux.org>
Date:	Fri, 18 May 2007 05:19:11 -0600
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To:	Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning

On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:11:58AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> It's also somewhat a matter of *taste* (and hence subjective), if you
> _still_ don't get it, Matthew, then there's no point continuing this thread
> and trying to convince you ad infinitum.

Right.  It's a matter of taste.  What makes you think you have taste?

I don't think that the module solution is perfect.  But abusing the
module parameters is a worse idea.  sysfs just isn't a good fit for this,
according to my taste.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/