[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070518135108.GB14225@ribosome.natur.cuni.cz>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 15:51:08 +0200
From: Martin Mokrejs <mmokrejs@...osome.natur.cuni.cz>
To: Kalpak Shah <kalpak@...syssoft.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ext3-users@...hat.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc1 killed my ext3 filesystem cleanly unmounted
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 05:17:06PM +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 11:06 +0200, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I just tried the 2.6.22-r1 candidate to test whether some bug I have
> > hit in the past still exists. I did use 2.6.20.6 so far. So, I have
> > cleanly rebooted to use the new kernel, after the machine came up I
> > tried to mess with the bug, and had to reboot again to play with kernel
> > commandline parameters. Unfortunately, on the next reboot fsck was
> > schedules on my filesystem after 38 clean mounts. :( And the problem
> > started. The fsck found some unused inodes, but probably did not know
> > where do they belong to, but it deleted them automagically. Finally, the
> > fsck died because it cannot fine some '..' entry.
> >
> > /dev/hda3: Entry '..' in .../??? (5701636) has deleted/unused inode
> > 5570561. CLEARED.
> > Unconnected directory inode 5570567 (...)
> >
> > /dev/hda3: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY.
> > (i.e., without -a or -p options)
> >
>
> This means that e2fsck has reached a point where it needs user
> intervention. So you should not run e2fsck with -p, -a or -y options.
> Look up the e2fsck man page for more on this.
Yeah, stupid init.d script in Gentoo. I will report at Gentoo as well but
how can I revert the changes? Can you say which directories were affected?
Thanks,
Martin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists