linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rt2] PowerPC: decrementer clockevent driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1179507059.12981.81.camel@chaos>
Date:	Fri, 18 May 2007 18:50:59 +0200
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	Matt Sealey <matt@...esi-usa.com>,
	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, mingo@...e.hu,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rt2] PowerPC: decrementer clockevent driver

On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 11:31 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> I asked this earlier, but figured you might have a better insight.   
> Is their value in having 'drivers' for more than one clock source?   
> I'd say most (of not all) the PPC SoCs have timers on the system side  
> that we could provide drivers for, I'm just not sure if that does  
> anything for anyone.

Not necessarily for the tick/highres stuff, but clock events allows
other users as well to utilize such facilities. We have no users yet,
but there are drivers, which utilize special timer hardware with nice
#ifdeffery to allow the driver to be shared. This might be a useful
thing for such stuff.

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/